A horse of a different color: Transpromotional as “Googlizing Print?”

19 06 2007

Pete Basiliere’s lastest article on Outputlinks, entitled, The Googlization of Print— Transactional Ads That Make Sense,” takes issue with the terms Transpromo and Transpromotional. I enjoyed the persepective in the article, but I do not agree that we have to dumb down terms to get acceptance. The departmental silos are the barriers, not the terminology.

Pete believes these terms (Transpromo and Transpromotional) are too print centric to garner appeal with the marketing professionals that can benfit from the concepts. . Instead, he proposes “the googlization of print” to convey bringing the Ad Sense concept to marketers.

That sounds a lot like “google eyes in print.” Googly eyes

Read the rest of this entry »



AAdvantage Statement: Offerred to Death

25 04 2007

I am a frequent flyer, and a member of American Airlines’ loyalty program. Aside from the discussion that most loyalty programs don’t really result in loyalty, I receive a lot of mail from American.

American’s AAdvantage monthly statement does a good job with transpromotional concepts. The upper right of the statement has all of my milage and upgrade information. The bulk of the statement is a letter with some good offers, and the coupon position contains 2 more offers. This month, I was offerred:

Read the rest of this entry »



Free monthly Transpromotional webinar

13 04 2007

Check out Pat McGrew’s monthly transpromo webinar. It’s the third Thursday of the month at 11:00  am EST.

I’ve attended the last few of these and they are a great source of case studies and how-tos for new and experienced Transpromotional professionals.

 



The case against inserts

7 03 2007

In most of today’s statement applications that use inserts, there is not decent tracking mechanism. This causes problems like my latest American Airlines AAdvantage statement. The statement did not include a lot of personalized content.

However, It did contain 6 inserts, and they were all nice full color offset ones with good design. The problem was that the piece included inserts for 2 competing flower services. Each had AA co-branded inserts in my statement. If I were them, I would be angry that they paid to share their chance to reach me with their number one competitor. That’s where AA made a large mistake by sticking to yesterday’s statement production practices.

How could this happen?

First, the inserts weren’t barcoded, so it’s probably an operator manually loading a hopper with incorrect inserts. The inserts were not barcoded, so Quality Control could not have caught this after the piece was inserted and sealed without ripping open samples and creating a reprint burden. If the inserts were barcoded, the system could have noticed that there were competing inserts.

So, there was no tracking mechanism in production, which means no tracking mechanism to accounting, which means no visibility of placement to the co-op advertiser who placed the insert to reduce AA’s postage burden. People have to stop thinking of statements as a burden and start thinking of them for what they are: great marketing opportunities.

How could this have been avoided?

Moving from inserts to onserts and personalized messages would resolve the bulk of this. Admittedly, I looked at the inserts. If the statement were delivered in full color, a narrow selected set of messages could have printed on my statement.

They could have done so much more. American knows that I am a loyal customer. They also know that my flying habits include frequent visits to Boston and New York, and a trip to the UK about every other month. It’s a pretty regular pattern, and as a customer I couldn’t have given them more actionable information if I called them. They know where I go and how long I stay. Their partners might like to reach out to someone that takes long flights. That could sell me a bigger iPod (because American Airlines doesn’t have in-seat video on international flights). Their partners could sell me sound masking earphones, a special carry-on bag, or even suggestions on travel books. I’m sure Tumi would like to get access to me, as would brookstone and even British retailers.

Someday, this will all pass, and I’ll have nothing in my mailbox to pick apart. But until that day, I have to continue doing this.

BTW: go ahead and leave comments:

Is a loyalty program wasting opportunities on you?